motorola uses skyhook…on android??

UPDATE (I should clarify that we do actually use skyhook – see below)

Frederic wrote about this on ReadWriteWeb over a week ago but it’s actually a very interesting story which seems to have gone under-reported.

As Frederic points out in his article the impact on developers from a technical standpoint is nothing – the O/S functional calls will remain identical – however it’s a fairly significant decision for Motorola – especially when one factors in cost.

Google’s location services come for free with Android (which is in and of itself free) for any hardware manufacturers.

I spoke with Ted Morgan, CEO of Skyhook Wireless – (at the RWW mobile summit last friday – see next blog post for more of this) and without disclosing any details he assured me Skyhook’s deal with Motorola is by no means free.

BTW the official press release is here

So the scenario we have here is a company (Motorola) deciding to choose a fee paying service over a free service…which is very interesting – especially when the free service is Google?

If you think about this it’s not comparing apples with apples – because the playing field is not level. If you were a new mobile phone manufacturer and you wanted to choose between licensing company A and B to provide your GPS chipset…that’s one thing.

In this case we have Google location finding BUILT IN to Android and FREE and Motorola is choosinng to go with a product that’s NOT FREE and NOT BUILT IN

The question is – is skyhook’s performance (or skyhook’s database of cellid/wifi) that much better than google’s that it would justify a per-handset cost?

I haven’t seen any compelling evidence to support this claim – though I have heard that a few Android based developers licensed skyhook on an individual basis (disclosure – we do not use skyhook on android – we use google’s built in location finding feature – but we do use skyhook on Nokia and Windows Mobile)

What do people think?


4 responses to “motorola uses skyhook…on android??

  1. Thanks for the link, Nick. It’s a really odd situation, but I can’t imagine Motorola would go for a deal like this if there wasn’t some major upside to at least some part of Motorola’s business here. The only thing I can think of is that Skyhook does indeed provide better service to Motorola.

    Maybe it’s not just the location, though. Maybe Google doesn’t offer any uptime guarantee for its service and Skyhook does?

  2. If you don’t start using our stuff Nick, I may come after you.

    By the way, we have made some good progress on that blackberry project we talked about. Any interest in being a beta?

    • hey – we do use your stuff πŸ˜‰ – I have amended the post to reflect that.
      we just don’t use it on android πŸ˜‰

      as for the beta – sure – happy to discuss that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s